Fall 2012 is
undeniably one of the best movie seasons that we’ve been blessed with in years.
Without fault, Oscar season has revved up to a plethora of chatter already as
movies are screened and devoured by critics and audiences alike. What makes
2012 particularly savvy, in my opinion, is the number of phenomenal films that
are works of art and accessible to the general public. Sure, the new rule
allowing for up to 10 nominations including crowd-pleasing blockbuster hits
like Inception, Toy Story 3, and The Help has generated lay interest in
the Oscars, but it’s been the unspoken rule that these movies won’t win. There
are better movies out there, even if they’re relatively inaccessible to a
normal film-goer seeking a good time.
2012 is different though. Silver Linings Playbook is the underdog hit already, receiving as
much public praise as critical. Argo was
one of the most well-crafted thrillers of our generation, solidifying the
brilliance of Ben Affleck behind the lens. Les
Miserables and Zero Dark Thirty have
screened to abundant enthusiasm, as well as The
Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. I have yet to see Life of Pi, but buzz indicates that Ang Lee was able to work a
miracle and make the so-called “unadaptable” novel a fulfilling vision. I leave
out a list of other brilliant endeavors being considered, among them The Dark Knight Rises, Skyfall, Anna
Karenina, The Sessions, and This is
40.
It seems that this is the year that the marriage between
brilliant film-making and connecting with a greater audience has been
fulfilled. So why are we even discussing the possibility of Lincoln as a Best Picture front-runner?
Voters, if you are reading this, I beg you to consider avoiding nominating
Steven Spielberg’s historical drama for the coveted award in February.
Lincoln is the
definition of Oscar bait. A good, albeit not great, expensive period piece
helmed by a well-known director with prominent acting talent. Every year these
films are thrown into the mix, the predictable nod that will undoubtedly be
considered a front-runner until the race is over. Why is there such a penchant
for allowing history to define what will be forever known as the most prominent
film released in a year?
I’m not devaluing these movies, but great film-making comes
from taking risks. Risky source material, creative technique, generating a new
voice that resonates with a generation that wasn’t previously present. Lincoln is none of the above, like the
period dramas that preceded it; it’s good but safe film. In a year when so many
film-makers took risks and created something new, something beautiful that
connected with the audience, it’s about time said films started reaping their
rewards.
Part of it is the value of the title “Best Picture” and the
money it generates once garnered. Greatness deserves to be recognized, and if
the best way to earn recognition is by allotting a film an award, so be it. But
more importantly, the Academy has served as a way to create films as relics for
when they were created. I, like many film enthusiasts before me, make a
diligent effort to watch all of the films that have either been nominated for
or won the top prize- often, they were the cultural touchstones of a year.
Increasingly, it’s becoming a members-only club that isn’t indicative of
critical success or cultural relevance. There’s been an outcry against the
Academy that’s become more vocal each year since Brokeback Mountain was snubbed to the tepid hit Crash. Actors, directors, screenwriters
are issuing a call to arms to boycott the Academy and what it symbolizes. I
would argue that it’s the political bullshit, the lack of equality in
determining what’s truly “great” and what we hope to define our generation-
part of which is held back by decisions like considering Lincoln an actually viable option in a year of so many greats.
So if you truly believe that Lincoln was the cats pajamas of 2012, I can’t fight your opinion
(IF IT’S INFORMED!) But to my readers who don’t spend every waking moment in
the cinema like I do, give the underdogs a chance this year. I promise you won’t
regret it.
No comments:
Post a Comment