Summit/Lionsgate have pissed a lot of people off with the
announcement that the final chapter of The
Twilight Saga having a “twist” ending, leaving interpretations for future
developments independent from the literary abortion that was the source
material. Producers have elaborated that “the Twilight Universe has plenty of stories to tell”; apparently, five
feature films about the most droll and anti-feminist romance of our time wasn’t
enough. First comes the horrific realization that, by being money-grabbing
scripts, these sequels could actually manage to be shittier than the
grotesquely dull existing titles. Then comes the even worse realization that
the Twilight phase could be elongated
for another five years. Film-literate consumers and straight men were
celebrating Friday for the end of a tyrannical oppressive reign on Hollywood,
arguably the worst film franchise of all time, with its detrimental societal
effects. I made room in my obscenely tight college budget to throw down for
some Grey Goose and a fancy dinner for the occasion; now it seems that developmentally
stunted 15-20-year-old fangirls will continue to be jaded sheep well into their
20s. I’ll be blacking out to that concept this weekend, my friends.
It’s a difficult dilemma; when can enough REALLY be enough?
Despite public perception, Hollywood is a volatile industry with limited
returns. While it’s easy to criticize industry leaders for churning out
bankable garbage (I’m looking at Disney with the gag-reflex trigger that was
their announcement of 2-3 LucasArts films PER YEAR), movies aren’t as bankable
as one would consider. The insurmountable costs involved, especially
considering the wild risk associated with creating something “new”, is
daunting. But one would hope industrialists have a passion for their industry,
and when the market has become polluted and is diluting the quality of existing
relative classics, when can the greed be capped off?
Twilight isn’t the
first franchise Hollywood has exploited generously, it’s just one of the most
perturbing ones of recent memory, particularly given its scope and success.
Between splitting the vapid Breaking Dawn
into two features (really, all four novels could have been condensed in a
single feature, mind you) to spurring an entire genre of shitty movies for
teens to consume, Twilight has done
enough fuckin’ damage to my era of pop culture. I’d really like the next
generation of women to admire a truly inspirational figure before being
brainwashed into soulless, subhuman housewives, Stephanie Meyer, so please put
down your sword. History of film has proven that there is never an adversion to
shamelessly seek a quick buck- Jaws 3,
The Hangover: Part II, Poltergeist 2, and the sequel to Terms of Endearment that no one
remembers all exist. But at what point is it worth compromising the integrity
of great source material? We’ve seen it in effect, particularly recently, of
the bitter taste of new installments corrupting the source. The Hangover: Part II is one of my go-to
examples; the shameless cash-grab really shook what made the first film a great
comedy, making me think of the “Wolf Pack” in more of a resentful manner than
anything else.
This is an age-old debate, but in a year where Hollywood
announced 95 sequels in the works (not counting remakes), the fast-food, low-nutritional
film structure is becoming the main form of consumption. In a medium used as an “escape” where
mainstream audiences seek “reliability”, sequels and remakes are an easy sell,
but are detrimental for the formation of defining pop cultural apexes.
Honestly, I’m all for “inspired exploitation” if the result
is a product that the original source would stand next to with dignity. For
every 30 Michael Bay like cash grabs, we get to feel a little hopeful with the
appearance of something like This is 40. I’m
not going to deny that this is Judd Apatow’s way of making some money after his
less-than-successful Funny People, a
capitalization on the popularity of his sleeper hit Knocked Up. But he seems genuinely invested in the project, seeking
to catch up with truly adorable characters as they undergo a new stage in their
lives; the story is relatable, inspiring, not far-fetched, and seems to induce
some real laughs. I have no doubt that Universal sought Apatow to create the
feature to pad their wallets; it can’t be a particularly expensive feature to
create and will (hopefully) see some pretty hefty returns- but it seems to have
been executed with integrity.
A huge chunk of this issue rests on our shoulders. I’ll
admit it, I saw Snow White and the
Huntsmen this summer. But if people continue to primarily consume cheap,
easy shit, of course the studio is going to continue to manufacture what the
people’s investments demand. This weekend, please don’t be a sheep to the hype.
Walk by the Breaking Dawn Pt 2 theater
and meet me in Silver Linings Playbook or
Anna Karenina.
No comments:
Post a Comment